Los Alamos National Labs
In September of 2001, several geologist at the lab agreed to do a number of tests on the Frass Meteorite. Before they would do these tests, they argued that they must take their own sample and that they must take a core sample that goes all the way through the meteorite. Thinking this was important, I allowed them to take the sample, even though materials and science was lost by their methods.
After taking the core sample, they refused to further study the rock saying that it didn't show signs of "shocking" and so it couldn't be a meteorite. I showed them a study (page 7 of the Introduction) which indicated that the known Martian meteorites showed little or no evidence of shocking, but this was not enough. They would not even look through my microscope to see the fusion crust or other features that identify it as a meteorite. Their claims was that the rock was clearly melted, but was a volcanic bomb. I showed them evidence of more than one creation date and the amount of sand that was in each vesicle of the rock, but evidence would not sway their opinion.
The dialog with the lab is on a hard drive that later got a virus. I've been afraid to reconnect this hard drive to my system to recover this dialog, but I'll try to do it soon and add it to this section.
All of the NASA scientists have said that there is no melting on the surface of the meteorite, only desert varnish. This goes against the evidence of fusion crust and my testimony of its arrival on Earth at the Frass Ranch. Any open and objective look at the meteorite could clearly determine if the exterior is melted or is only been accosted by the actions of bacteria and weather over hundreds or thousands of years.