>To: Sharpton, Buck

>Subject: re: re: visit

>

><<File: glass1.jpg>><<File: glass3.jpg>>

>Buck,

>I will take any meeting with any people anytime. And my ex says I'm hard to

>get along with.

>

>The reason I want other experts, like Mars experts, and not just meteorite

>experts is because meteorite experts have things backwards. They don't think

>anything is a meteorite unless they proclaim it a meteorite. But a meteorite

>is a piece of space debris that falls to Earth, not something proclaimed a

>meteorite by an expert. Logically and philosophically, their opinion that all

>meteorites must be non-vesicled rocks with flat surfaces just doesn't hold

>up. All of my experiences as a human being tell me this rock fell from the

>sky and shows every sign of friction with the atmosphere. I just don't think

>there is a scenario where a lava rock would be made in a river bed 50ma, lay

>there for 36ma, and then be encompassed by another piece of lava rock 13

>million years ago. Then it had to somehow stay dry and then get lifted into

>space so that it could fall on the Frass ranch. And all of the material for

>both rocks and the sand inside is made from the same source material and has

>a linear nature. We now know for certain that these types of vesicles rock

>are prevalent on Mars and thus it is probable that some have made their way

>to Earth.

>

>As more evidence of this rock's external heating, I took another sample from

>the rock today. I was trying to get some of the 50ma rock to see if it was

>made the same way that the gray rock was made: that is by lava moving through

>a sandy watercourse. I think that it was. Every vesicle has clay like

>material in it. I don't think that the particles could get into every

>vesicle by filtration after the rock was created. The only difference

>between the two rocks is that the red rock seems to be associated with the

>clay like material while the sandy mixture that hasn't been wet in 13ma is

>associated with the gray rock. The red (50ma) rock does appear to have been

>under some influence of water, but it was there 36ma before being entombed by

>the gray rock and was never tumbled in a stream, just slightly wet a few

>times.. Anyway, as I looked through the debris that fell out of the hole

>from the latest sample, I spied another little piece of glass. The one I

>found today is labeled glass3 and I have included glass1, a piece of glass

>with tiny particles embedded within that didn't get melted. To me, this

>means the edges of the rock had to be above 1000 degrees F. The glass3

>sample is curved like a contact lens and is irregular over its entire

>surface. You can see some of the wiggles at the bottom of the picture. It

>looks like it was just peeled off the lava material. The glass1 sample is

>curved on the bottom but is flat on top. The particles melted within didn't

>get hot enough to be melted and they are trapped like it was a tiny paper

>weight.

>

>

>So I guess I really don't care who you invite to the meeting. It is obvious

>that you don't believe this rock is a meteorite or you would be really

>excited about what it means. You are now writing your own individual chapter

>of this book in history. I know that sooner or later, this rock will get the

>recognition and attention it deserves. I will do my best to make humankind

>aware of the rock and once it becomes known, we will all joke about the time

>it took NASA to realize what a treasure I have to offer. My goal is to make

>NASA look good in this matter and all matters, so it doesn't matter how long

>you take to make your report, because I will do my best to make sure that no

>one suffers anything but a red face when this is over. But on the other side

>of the coin, mankind does need to know about this rock and NASA in particular

>needs to know the facts before sending any more probes to Mars. This rock

>indicates to me that volcanic action may still be present and most assuredly

>life still exists on Mars. If the volcanoes are still seeping, there could be

>some very interesting things still making their way around these heat and

>water sources.

>

>Invite who you want and I will just let history record the results. I don't

>trust the meteorite experts because I don't feel they have dealt with me in

>good faith. No body likes to admit they have made a mistake and especially

>experts. If the people you invite are open and honest and give me a fair

>chance, that is all I could ever ask for. But once burned, most people

>become less trustful and I have been told a lot of things by a lot of experts

>that haven't come true. I have built my life around the truth and my word is

>very important to me. When I tell someone that I will do something, I try

>very hard to make sure that my word means something. The reason I want other

>experts there is because they haven't already made up their minds and I feel

>they will be more open minded since I am claiming this is a new type of

>meteorite and so none of the experts have every seen one before. So if I can

>prove to a Mars expert that this rock might have come from Mars, then it

>would have to be a meteorite, unless someone happened to bring a piece of

>Mars back to Earth. I personally think that it got here by natural means,

>because I am unconvinced of the existence of aliens and mankind hasn't gotten

>to Mars yet. But no matter what I have told Kring or tried to show him, he

>just says he doesn't believe it is a meteorite. His mind is made up and he

>won't listen to valid scientific arguments. This rock is too important for

>opinion and needs to be studied carefully and truthfully by people who have

>the training and proper equipment..

>

>So do want you want, invite who you want, and take as much time as you want.

>But please remember, one day everyone will know of your actions or inactions.

> That day may be sooner than you think.

>

>Your friend,

>

>