![]() |
MarsRock |
![]() |
| ...dedicated to the return of life to mars! | ||
|
Contents My Pet Rock Statement of Purpose Letters to Buck Letters to Hap Letters to Ron Letters to Jamie Letters to Others Letters to Alan Letters to Mike How to Join MarsRock MartianChronicle Common Links Micromike's Site Overview Please Help Home |
Mike 6
| Mike, I studied your sample with the electron microprobe, using what is called EDS analysis. This is a semi-quantitative method for identifying individual mineral phases by their elemental spectra. Your sample contains small grains of feldspar, quartz and magnetite. The bulk composition is fairly high in silica, with lesser amounts of aluminum, calcium, sodium, potassium and iron. Texturally and compositionally, it appears to be a high-silica volcanic rock, most likely a rhyolite. Since rhyolitic volcanic rock is not uncommon to your area of Texas and New Mexico, I would suggest that you try to find a connection with a nearby volcanic field. You now have plenty of data to do this. This may not be your preferred explanation for the origin of your rock, but all possibilities must be considered. We have found nothing about the sample to suggest that it is meteoritic, although we are certainly not discouraging you from performing more tests. At this point, any more work that we do would require much more expensive and time-consuming tests, which we reserve for our own research program and the occasional sample that we have determined to be a meteorite based on other evidence. I also took the liberty of putting the large sample you sent me into an ultrasonic bath to extract the interior particles. They mostly appear to be sand-sized particles derived from the rock itself. If you are still convinced that this rock was blasted off another large planet, you would have to demonstrate that it has internal shock deformation. We did not see evidence for this in thin section. The scoriaceous texture of the rock makes it an unlikely candidate to have survived such an event. Much more likely is that it was recently eroded out of an outcropping of volcanic rock not too far from where you found it. It may be possible that a rock this light could have been partly transported by wind, as well as running water. Some of the particles inside the cavities may also have been deposited by wind. I don't mean to disappoint you with our interpretation, but I cannot see being able to justify any more tests on this sample by our lab. If you want to pursue it further, there is one more thing you can do. A commercial laboratory will also perform neutron activation analyses for $100 or so, which will get you high-precision trace element data. The key elements for extra-terrestrial comparisons would be elements like Fe, Mn, Al, Ga, K, La. If you decide to do this, I would still be happy to go over the data with you. Chemex labs should be able to do this kind of analysis. Thanks for your efforts. We admire your persistence, and I'm sorry we can't be more optimistic about the origin of your rock. I'll be happy to return any sample that you sent us, just let me know if you want it back. Best regards, Jamie **************************************************************** James D. Gleason Lunar and Planetary Laboratory University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 (520) 621-7984 (phone) (520) 621-6783 (fax) jgleason@gamma1.LPL.arizona.edu
|
|
All rights reserved worldwide. |
A license to use pictures and text can be purchased for a nominal fee at: www.thegravitystore.com |
My Pet Rock
Please Help Statement of Purpose
Sites overview
Contents Letters to
Buck Letters to Hap Letters
to Ron Letters to Jamie Letters
to Others Letters to Alan Letters to Mike
How to Join
MarsRock.org Home NASA contact page |
| Questions or comments? contacts: Aaron@micromike.com web pages mike@micromike.com. content |